It is difficult to change constituency
boundaries for one-man-one-vote
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
23 June 2024
Several readers have pointed out to me that the
“One-Man” campaign is not just about the distribution of money; it is
also about fair representation of people. Hence the second part of the
slogan is “One-Man-One Vote”. The campaigners claim that the densely
populated regions do not have equal representation in parliament since
their MPs represent more people. Thus, they are seeking an increment in
the number of constituencies in these regions or greater weight in their
votes in parliament.
One of the proposals that I made during the
constitution making process, was to change the way we determine the
number of constituencies: to use the population instead of having a
fixed number. This was not accepted and so, Article 89(1) reads: “There
shall be two hundred and ninety constituencies for the purposes of the
election of the members of the National Assembly…”.
Having a fixed number makes it difficult to
review boundaries. If the number of constituencies is increased in one
region, they must be reduced in another. Of course, such a move would
generate a lot of opposition from areas losing their numbers.
My
view is that, like in the distribution of money, both population and
land area are important considerations when deciding on number of
constituencies. It is difficult for one MP to reach, say, 300,000
citizens in a densely populated urban area. Similarly, it is also tough
for one to get to 30,000 people spread over, say 20,000 square
kilometres.
For these reasons, I proposed that we put a
constitutional limit on the number of inhabitants in each constituency
to 100,000. Then we use the national population to determine the number
of constituencies in the country. With this formula and going by the
2019 census result, we would be having 476 constituencies.
Once this number is established, the next step
is to determine the maximum size of a constituency. We find this by
dividing the country’s total area (582,646 square kilometres) by 476 and
then multiplying the result by two. The answer is 2,448 sq.km.
Thus, the IEBC should make constituency
boundaries to make sure that none has more than 100,000 inhabitants and
none sits on an area greater than 2,448sq.km. That way, both concerns
about population and area are taken care of. As it is, my proposal was
not accepted; consequently, we shall have to go through the lengthy
process of constitutional amendment every time we wish to change the
number of constituencies.
|