Practising 3Ws reduces infection rates dramatically
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
25 October 2020
Since January this
year, health authorities the world over have been repeating the 3Ws song
on a daily basis. The 3Ws are the three simple actions that protect from
contracting Covid-19. They are: (1) Wash your hands regularly, (2) Wear
a mask whenever you’re outside your house, and (3) Watch your distance
from other people – stay at least 1m away from them.
The question is: how
effective are these simple actions in protecting against the disease. I
have seen several studies attempting to measure the risk reduction
factors of each of these measures. Washing hands at least five times
daily reduces the infection rate by about 40 per cent.
That is, when two
groups are compared – one that washes hands five times daily versus
another one that does not – then, after a period of time, the number of
infections in the first group is 60 per cent that of the second one.
Wearing
a mask is even more effective. The infection rate among people who wear
the masks is just 25 per cent of those who don’t. And the chance of
infection when you are one metre away is only 20 per cent compared to
staying at close proximity.
When these three
protective actions are combined, the net effect is dramatic. It is 60
per cent of 25 per cent of 20 per cent. That is 0.6 x 0.25 x 0.2 = 0.03.
In other words, when you observe these three measures, the chances of
getting infected are just 3 per cent of not doing them at all.
That is, you will
reduce the probability of infection by 97 per cent. So, if you ever
doubted whether the 3Ws can help you, the numbers are clear.
===
Positivity rate” is
the new catch phrase in the fight against Covid-19. But what is it and
what does it tell us about the disease?
Positivity rate is
simply the proportion of tested individuals who turn out to have the
disease. If, say, 500 people are tested and 100 are found to be
positive, then the positivity rate is 20 per cent.
As to what it tells
us about the spreading of the disease is still a mystery to me! The only
thing I can read out of this number is how well the authorities are
targeting their test subjects. But that has nothing to do with the
prevalence of the disease!
|