Road maintenance should be done on a “last come, first
served” basis
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
01 December 2019
I do not wish to
delude myself that my article last week prompted the government to start
repairing roads. Project planning is a long process and so, the recently
announced tenders for maintenance of various roads funded by the Fuel
Levy must have started long before I wrote the article.
If you missed the
story, the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA) advertised for
tenders to carry out maintenance works in the second and third quarter
of the 2019/20 financial year at a cost of Sh13.5 billion.
The information that
I used last week was taken from the Annual Public Roads Programme
2018/19 published by the Kenya Roads Board (KRB). In the document, KRB
notes that the Road Maintenance Fuel Levy raised Sh64.996 billion in the
last financial year.
The roads board also
gives the breakdown of the amounts allocated to various agencies that
are involved in roads maintenance. These are KeNHA (Sh23.6B), KURA
(Sh5.8B), KeRRA (Sh12.4B), County governments (Sh8.3B) and Kenya
Wildlife Services (Sh570 million).
I noticed a curious
entry in the breakdown of road distances that each agency has earmarked
for repairs. The Kenya Rural Roads Authority (KeRRA) is planning to work
on 21,091km yet it manages 19,529km. There is no explanation of where
the extra 1,562km come from.
KRB also notes that
the Sh65B fuel levy is not enough to carry out all the needed repairs.
This appears to go against the point I made last week that the funds are
adequate. However, KRB explains that there was a long period of neglect
before the maintenance levy was introduced.
Presumably, the
agencies are working on a “first come, first served” basis; that is,
starting with the roads that were first in the waiting list.
Unfortunately, this is the wrong way to approach for repair works.
This is one of the
few unique instances where “last come, first served” would be the more
effective approach. The reason is that when repairs are carried out
immediately at the first sign of damage, the cost is low and the
repaired section lasts almost as long as a new road.
But when repairs are
delayed, the road deteriorates very quickly and the cost of fixing it
shoots up exponentially. So, if we start with the worst roads that have
been waiting for a long time, they eat up all the money available.
As the agency waits
for more funds, the road that had just few problems also deteriorate
fast. By the time money becomes available, the road is in a terrible
state and costs will have skyrocketed.
Eventually, we find
ourselves in a situation where we are always fixing very badly worn out
roads. It begins to appear as if the agencies are deliberately ignoring
lightly damaged and always waiting until the repair cost is high enough
to attract “decent” kickbacks.
This is not the case.
It is a systemic problem created by the “first come, first served”
strategy. Road maintenance should be done on a “last come, first served”
basis.
|