| 
		 
		
		
		Road maintenance should be done on a “last come, first 
		served” basis 
		By MUNGAI KIHANYA 
		The Sunday Nation 
		Nairobi,  
		01 December 2019 
		  
		
		I do not wish to 
		delude myself that my article last week prompted the government to start 
		repairing roads. Project planning is a long process and so, the recently 
		announced tenders for maintenance of various roads funded by the Fuel 
		Levy must have started long before I wrote the article. 
		
		If you missed the 
		story, the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA) advertised for 
		tenders to carry out maintenance works in the second and third quarter 
		of the 2019/20 financial year at a cost of Sh13.5 billion. 
		
		The information that 
		I used last week was taken from the Annual Public Roads Programme 
		2018/19 published by the Kenya Roads Board (KRB). In the document, KRB 
		notes that the Road Maintenance Fuel Levy raised Sh64.996 billion in the 
		last financial year. 
		
		The roads board also 
		gives the breakdown of the amounts allocated to various agencies that 
		are involved in roads maintenance. These are KeNHA (Sh23.6B), KURA 
		(Sh5.8B), KeRRA (Sh12.4B), County governments (Sh8.3B) and Kenya 
		Wildlife Services (Sh570 million). 
		
		I noticed a curious 
		entry in the breakdown of road distances that each agency has earmarked 
		for repairs. The Kenya Rural Roads Authority (KeRRA) is planning to work 
		on 21,091km yet it manages 19,529km. There is no explanation of where 
		the extra 1,562km come from. 
		
		KRB also notes that 
		the Sh65B fuel levy is not enough to carry out all the needed repairs. 
		This appears to go against the point I made last week that the funds are 
		adequate. However, KRB explains that there was a long period of neglect 
		before the maintenance levy was introduced. 
		
		Presumably, the 
		agencies are working on a “first come, first served” basis; that is, 
		starting with the roads that were first in the waiting list. 
		Unfortunately, this is the wrong way to approach for repair works. 
		
		This is one of the 
		few unique instances where “last come, first served” would be the more 
		effective approach. The reason is that when repairs are carried out 
		immediately at the first sign of damage, the cost is low and the 
		repaired section lasts almost as long as a new road. 
		
		But when repairs are 
		delayed, the road deteriorates very quickly and the cost of fixing it 
		shoots up exponentially. So, if we start with the worst roads that have 
		been waiting for a long time, they eat up all the money available. 
		
		As the agency waits 
		for more funds, the road that had just few problems also deteriorate 
		fast. By the time money becomes available, the road is in a terrible 
		state and costs will have skyrocketed. 
		
		Eventually, we find 
		ourselves in a situation where we are always fixing very badly worn out 
		roads. It begins to appear as if the agencies are deliberately ignoring 
		lightly damaged and always waiting until the repair cost is high enough 
		to attract “decent” kickbacks. 
		
		This is not the case. 
		It is a systemic problem created by the “first come, first served” 
		strategy. Road maintenance should be done on a “last come, first served” 
		basis. 
		 |