Form on selection:
choices have consequences! By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
08 February 2015
After the public outcry regarding the national schools form-one
selections, I went to the Ministry of Education website to look for
information and I was shocked. The page is written in English, but it
reads like Greek mixed with Arabic and a sprinkling of Chinese! Still, I
tried to make sense of it and this is what I came out with.
The process gives priority to pupils’ choices. Those who have chosen a
particular school as their first preference are grouped according to
their primary school districts. The same is done for the second, third
and fourth preferences.
Each district group is then split into two subgroups: one for public and
the other for private primary schools. Next; the pupils in each subgroup
are arranged in order of their KCPE scores.
Pupils to be admitted to a particular school are then selected from the
“first-preference” list in their order of merit (KCPE marks). If the
secondary school does not fill up, it is given pupils in the second
“preference list”, then the third and, finally, the fourth list.
It is important to note that, at this stage of the process, pupils are
not assigned to schools they did not choose no matter how high their
scores were! As can be expected, the most popular national schools – the
Alliances, Starehes etc – fill up with students from the
“first-preference” list.
Once all the nation school slots are filled up, the process moves to
county schools. In this case, the pupils who have applied to a
particular school are divided into three groups: (1) applicants from
outside the secondary school’s county, (2) those from within its county
(but outside its home district), and, (3) those from its home district.
The allocation is done in order of KCPE merit and according to the
following quotas: Group (1) gets 40 per cent of places, Group (2) 40 per
cent and Group (3) 20 per cent. Again, popular county schools fill up
quickly with pupils from “first-preference” county school lists.
Because of this prioritisation of pupils’ choices, many are left out
since all their preferred schools are filled by those who were in
“higher-preference” lists. These pupils are assigned to schools which
still have spaces. These will obviously not be amongst those chosen by
the pupil.
My take on this is that it is fair; however, pupils must choose
carefully. If we concentrate only on the marks scored, we will miss the
opportunity to teach our children that life is about making choices and
“choices have consequences”!
A good example is one Albert Ochieng who was reported in the
Daily Nation of January 28. He
scored 407 marks and could not make it to any of his chosen national
schools: Alliance,
Maranda, Lenana, and Maseno (all very popular).
Once he missed out on Alliance, he could not get
his other choices because they had been filled by their
“first-preference” list! So he ended up in a County school – Ramba Boys,
in his home county of Siaya.
|