Why “most”
might be the same as “majority”
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
21 July 2013
I came across an
argument between two bloggers on the Internet. One had written that
“many teachers were not supporting the strike” while the other insisted
that “the majority of teachers” were for the industrial action. The
argument ensued because the two could not agree on the distinction
between many and
most.
Many
people interpret the word “many” in the same way as “most”. However,
strictly speaking, any number more than one is many. But thinking about
it that way, one might be hard-pressed to define the meaning of “few”.
And while we are at it, what is the meaning of “most’, any way? Is it
the same as “majority”?
In my mind, the three
comparatives are defined as follows. The first is “few” meaning more
than one but not greater than 33 per cent. The second is “many” which
means higher than 33 per cent but not above 66 per cent. Then, finally,
“most” is above 66 per cent but not 100 per cent. Obviously, 100 per
cent is “all”.
Notice that in these
definitions, “most” doesn’t mean simply more than half. Anything between
50 and 66 per cent is “many”; not most. If pressed harder, I’d call it
“majority”.
So far so good: but I
have hidden away an important element. “Comparatives” are used for
comparing quantities. So, when we say such and such a per cent, what
is the basis for comparison? What number is it a per cent of?
This is always
implied in the context. For example, when I write that “Many
people interpret the word ‘many’ in the same way as ‘most’” the basis
for comparison is the total population of English speakers. That is,
anything between about 600 million and 1.2 billion out of the estimated
1.8 billion people who speak English.
But sometimes it is
not so obvious. When we say something like “it will take many years for Kenya to become a high-income
nation”, what are we using for comparison? Perhaps it is the average
lifespan of a human being – about 70 years. In that case, many years
means anywhere between 23 and 46 years.
Now we begin to
understand why economists consider
Kenya’s Vision 2030 to be an ambitious
development plan. Its 22 years (from2008 to 2030) are not many; they are
few according to the above definition!
Other times people
use their own social or physical status as the basis for comparison.
Thus when I say many years ago I mean a different number from what my
father might have in mind when he says the same thing. About 20 years
for me and 50 years for him.
What about “very
many” and “very few”? Well, I’ll that for you to figure out for
yourself.
|