Why Curiosity travelled longer distance than necessary
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
23 September 2012
J. G. Kameru is wondering about the flight of NASA’s spacecraft, the
Curiosity Rover which landed on Mar recently. S/he writes: “How come the
Rover travelled 560million km to mars and we know the actual distance is
230m km? Why the difference of 330m km”
Well, first of all, it is not true that the planet Mars is 230 million
kilometres away from earth. The distance is constantly changing all the
time but it varies from about 52m km to just over 400m km. The oft
quoted 230m km is just the average of these two numbers.
To understand this, bear in mind that the Earth is the third planet from
the sun and Mars is the fourth. While we are about 150 million km from
the sun, Mars is 229 million km. Now it is very tempting to subtract
these two distances and conclude that Mars is 79million km. But that
would be wrong – very wrong indeed.
The problem is that such a calculation assumes that the two planets
revolve around the sun synchronously and at the same rate. But the
reality is that the Earth takes 365 days and Mars 780 days.
Therefore, there are times when the two planets are on opposite sides of
the sun and others when they are on the same side. Furthermore, the
orbits of planets are not circular; they are elliptical.
Because of the elliptical orbit, the distance of the Earth from the sun
varies from about 147m to 152m km. That of mars is from 206m to 249m km.
So, the closest separation between the two planets occurs when they are
on the same side of the sun with the Earth at its farthest distance
(152m km) and Mars at its nearest (206m km). In that arrangement, the
two are only 52m km apart (206m minus 152m).
The maximum separation occurs when the two are on opposite sides and at
their farthest from the sun. In that case the distance between them is
about 401m km (152m plus 249m).
Still, that does not explain why the Curiosity Rover covered 560m km.
The reason is that the spacecraft did not travel along a straight line
from Earth to Mars. It followed a spiral path.
Whereas a straight line might appear as the best path to follow, it
would require too much fuel. The more efficient method is to accelerate
the spacecraft to a higher orbital velocity than that of the earth
(107,000km/h).
That way, the craft drifts naturally away from the sun and, if the
timing is right, it will cross paths with Mars and get trapped by the
planets gravity. In this manoeuvre, the engines of the spacecraft are
switched off as soon as it reaches the desired velocity. This saves
immense amounts of energy. The resultant path is thus a spiral which is
longer than a straight line.
|