The national budget in three minutes
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
04 July 2010
The Minister for Finance read his budget for 2010/11
and he is planning to spend close to one trillion shillings. Some media
reports said that this is the largest budget in history and I found that
comment curious. When you think about it, every budget is always larger
than the one of the previous year. Therefore, there is nothing special
about the current one being greater than all previous ones. Take it from
me; even the one for next year will be bigger than all the others in
history!
If you didn’t know, one trillion can mean different
things to different people. In the USA, it is the
number one followed by 12 zeroes. In the
UK, it has 18 zeroes, and in some parts of France, a trillion has 24 zeroes. To
understand the reasons behind this discrepancy, you will have to check
the archives: World of Figures,
1st August 2004.
Unfortunately, I did not get a chance to listen to
this year’s budget speech, but I managed to get a copy of the full text
from the Ministry of Finance website (www.treasury.go.ke). In a
nutshell; the government plans to spend Sh998.8 billion in the coming
financial year. This means the trillion we heard in the media about was
the US
kind.
If you divide that sum equally amongst 40 million
Kenyans, it comes to about Sh25,000 per person over the next 12 months.
That is slightly over Sh2,000 per month. Now, depending on your world
view, you can either see this as the amount of money that will be spent
on you, or the money which you will need to contribute in order to keep
our national affairs running. I leave that up to you.
Out of the Sh998.8b, about Sh320b (32 per cent) will
go towards development projects and Sh675b (68 per cent) to recurrent
expenditure. While development expenses are somewhat self-explanatory
(roads, hospitals, schools etc), recurrent costs need elaboration. They
include administrative expenses (salaries, rents, consumables etc) and
loan repayments (including interest and other attendant costs).
Now those figures may not mean much unless they are
compared to some past record. The year 2002 provides a good point of
comparison because this was when KANU (Mr. Uhuru Kenyatta’s party) lost
the leadership of the country for the first time since independence.
In that year, the total budget was Sh324b. That’s
about one third of this year’s figure. Another way of looking at it is
that the budget has been growing at an average of 15 per cent every
year. A word caution is necessary here: this is not the rate of economic
growth!
Of the Sh324b, only Sh43b was earmarked for
development in 2002 and the rest was meant for recurrent expenses. In
the 2010 budget, the figure is Sh320b – seven and a half times higher.
In fact, the development expenditure this year will be almost equal to
the total budget of 2002.
Another improvement is the distribution between
development and recurrent expenses. It is 32-to-68 respectively this
year, compared to 13-to-87 in 2002. That means we are increasing
spending on development faster than that on consumption.
|