You need at least 2,000 days to walk around the Earth
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
12 April 2009
Peter Wanjohi is still not convinced that the Earth is round. He says:
“You contradict yourself…when you say that there is a triangle
originating at an observer at the seashore to a ship at the horizon.
Doesn't that prove exactly what you are trying to disapprove, a flat
earth, or does the curvature of the world only start at the horizon?”
Peter further argues that if the observer had a powerful telescope able
to “see around the world, there would still be a triangle extending all
the way.” This, he says would be proof “that light travels in a straight
line and that the sea level is truly level.”
He therefore concludes: “This creates a paradox of a flat yet round
earth, which in my opinion is resolved by a weird conclusion that the
earth is not three-dimensional but multidimensional with spatial
singularities or boundary conditions all over. What do you think?”
Well, you lost me on that last statement regarding “…multidimensional
spatial singularities or boundary conditions….”, nevertheless, I must
hasten to correct one false assertion: No matter how powerful a
telescope is, it cannot see around the world!
In fact, all telescopes mounted at eye-level at the sea shore can view
only 5km of water surface…after that, there are clouds and stars beyond
the horizon. The reason is simply that light travels in a straight line
– as Peter rightly says.
Therefore, light from “below” (as opposed to “beyond”) the horizon can
never reach the telescope…so it cannot be seen. The problem is not the
magnifying power; it is the direction from where the light is coming.
Let me also clarify a point about the triangle I alluded to last week.
It has three straight sides: one from the eyes to the horizon, a second
one from the eye to the feet, and the third line from the feet to the
horizon.
Now the third line does not run on the surface of the sea. If it did,
then Peter would be right to conclude that the surface is flat. Since
the Earth is round, the third line of the triangle runs under the sea.
You may want to visit my website (www.MungaiKihanya.com) to see a
picture showing how this is done.
If
you are still not convinced, then this question from Muita Wangoko might
help: “If I start moving from one point on earth and move straight
ahead, is possible that I will come back to the same place one day and
time?”
Yes you will, Muita: assuming that there will be bridges over the seas,
lakes and rivers that you will find on your straight path, your journey
will be at least 40,000km.
I say “at least” because I assumed the Earth to be a smooth round
object. In reality it isn’t: there are hills and valleys that increase
the actual distance walked. Thus you might find yourself walking
50,000km.
At the average walking speed of 5km per hour, that would take you 10,000
hours. If you walked five hours a day and rested the remainder of the
time, the journey would take you 2,000 days, or five and a half
years…but since there are no bridges, this might prove an impossible
expedition!
|