Constituencies can be determined by both size and population

By MUNGAI KIHANYA

The Sunday Nation

Nairobi,

01 November 2009

 

The question of constituency boundaries is threatening to split the country down the middle…along the straight line running from Lokichogio to Malindi! On the eastern side there are politicians arguing that their people are under-represented in parliament and on the west, there are others also claiming that their people are under-represented.

Their reasons are, however, different. Those from the east say they need more constituencies because the present ones are too large and those from the west are asking for more because the current ones have too many people.

These two arguments are valid. If you live on the eastern side of the dividing line and wanted to see your MP, the journey to the local constituency office can easily take you five days – it is far away and roads don’t exist. On the hand, if you are from the west, the journey will take you a few hours, but when you get there, you will find so many other people seeking assistance and you can easily queue for five days before being seen.

The bottom line, therefore, is that the people of Kenya are seriously under-represented and so we need to create more constituencies to remedy the situation.

I wrote on this matter in September 2007and suggested that the distribution of constituencies should be based on both the population and the surface area of the country. I proposed that we should limit the population (not the number of voters) in a constituency to a maximum of 100,000 inhabitants.

I further suggested that, we divide the national population by 100,000, to get the total number of constituencies in the country. Thus; 39 million divided by 100,000, equals 390 constituencies.

In order to take account of the surface area, I proposed that we divide the country’s area [580,000 square kilometres] by the number of constituencies [390] and multiply the result [1,500sq.km] by two to get the maximum limit for the constituency size [3,000sq.km].

Now; I would like to demonstrate how the idea would work by using two Provinces from the “warring” regions – Central and North Eastern.

The population of Central currently stands at about 4.8 million. With that number and the limit of 100,000 inhabitants, this Province should be divided into 48 constituencies.

With a total area of about 14,000sq.km, 48 constituencies would each cover about 292sq.km. This is well within the allowed maximum size of 3,000sq.km.

North Eastern has about 1.25 million people and using the same population limit, this region should have 13 constituencies. This is only two more than the current number. However, since the total area of this Province is 127,000sq.km, the average area per constituency would come to over 13,000sq.km – four times the 3,000sq.km limit.

Therefore, for this region, population would not be a good way of determining the number of constituencies. However, using the 3,000sq.km limit, it turns out that this Province should be divided into at least 32 constituencies. These would have an average of just under 40,000 people each, which is within the 100,000 limit.

I am surprised that Nairobi politicians have not been very vocal in this debate, yet theirs is the greatest victim of under-representation. Using the above idea, Nairobi should have at least 35 constituencies instead of the present eight. Perhaps its MPs have chosen to give their opinions directly to the IBRC instead of blowing hot air at public barazas.

 
     
  Back to 2009 Articles  
     
 
World of Figures Home About Figures Consultancy