How printed money increases inflation
By MUNGAI KIHANYA
The Sunday Nation
Nairobi,
14 September 2008
Lawi Kariuki would like to understand how “illegal” printing of money
causes inflation. He writes: “Please explain to me how [this occurs]...
refer to the following scenarios in your explanation: (1) Tourists visit
our country and bring 1 billion shillings in foreign exchange into our
economy. (2) There are no tourists coming but we imagine they have come
and brought in 1 billion shillings; so we print this amount of money and
introduce it into the economy. Why will the second scenario cause
inflation and not the first one?”
Well, Lawi, there is absolutely nothing wrong with printing money.
Governments do it all the time. The problem is introducing it into
circulation carelessly. But before we go into the reasons why, the two
scenarios that you provided would not make any noticeable change in the
inflation of Kenya.
This is because our economy has about one trillion shillings in
circulation. Adding another one billion is just a drop in the ocean. One
trillion is one thousand billions, thus the scenarios you give are
equivalent to adding one shilling to a person who already has one
thousand!
But if we add one trillion shillings to the economy at one go the
inflation would shoot up whether that money came from tourists or the
printing plant on Thika road!
The reason is this: when people have money, they want to spend it,
otherwise the money is worthless. This increases demand for goods and
services to the point of creating shortages. Suppliers respond by
increasing prices (it’s a normal human behaviour) and inflation shoots
up.
But the key issue is how the people get the money in the first place. If
tourists visit and leave a trillion shillings behind that money will
initially be in the hands of hotels, taxi drivers, the KWS, local
airlines etc. This first group will get it in exchange for services and
products sold to the tourists.
The second level to get the same money will be people who supply the
first group. For example petrol stations will experience additional
demand (fuelling more taxis and other vehicles that carry the tourists)
and increase prices.
People in the tourism related businesses will not complain about the
increased price of petrol, after all, they’ll have the money to buy it.
It is only the rest of us “outsiders” who will fell the pinch.
On the other hand, if the one trillion shillings was simply printed, the
question would be how to “introduce it into the economy”. Money is a
medium of exchange for goods and services. So it can only be introduced
through a process where the government buys something from “the
economy”. This would have the same effect as the money from tourists.
Unfortunately, when governments print excess money, it is usually
“given” to cronies without supplying anything in return. The “free”
money is then spent in a wanton manner and it has devastating effects on
the economy.
For example, we can decide to build a road using manual labour. Employ
strong young people to do the work and then print money to pay them.
There would be nothing wrong with that because the road would be useful
to the society.
|